Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.programmer.misc > #1923
| From | Iron Spring Software <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.programmer.misc |
| Subject | Still alive? Memory. edm2? |
| Date | 2025-02-03 14:19 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vnrbs8$1f9gv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
1. Is anyone still reading this NG? 2. I was curious about OS/2 memory allocation (DosAllocMem), and too lazy to see if the information I want is in the redbooks, which probably don't reflect the current status of ArcaOS anyway. At any rate I recalled that each call to DosAlloc allocates 64K (65536) bytes, and my question was whether or not there was any overhead in the allocated memory. I write a Q+D program that made two allocations of one byte each, followed by two allocations of 64K, and in all cases the addresses of the allocated memory were 64K apart, so no overhead. [probably y'all knew this already] 3. I was going to make a note on the talk page for DosAllocMem page in the edm2 wiki to help out any other clueless people who might happen along, but either talk isn't implemented or I need to sign on because I got a message something like "unable to handle this request" when I clicked talk.
Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Still alive? Memory. edm2? Iron Spring Software <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2025-02-03 14:19 -0700
Re: Still alive? Memory. edm2? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 19:12 -0800
Re: Still alive? Memory. edm2? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Still alive? Memory. edm2? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2025-02-07 12:38 +0100
Re: Still alive? Memory. edm2? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-07 08:08 -0700
Re: Still alive? Memory. edm2? "Steven Levine" <steve53@nomail.earthlink.net> - 2025-02-08 19:46 +0000
csiph-web