Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.programmer.misc > #125
| From | Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.programmer.misc |
| Subject | Re: Writing WAV files through a pipe |
| Date | Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:15:48 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | U.C. Berkeley Math. Department. |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <slrnip4thk.6jv.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu> (permalink) |
| References | <stfVq7QNr4pc-pn2-3WRfnSQgDzPo@localhost> <Bd1D8ggkpXsj-pn2-4j5b5WpNLPzO@Rudi6> <stfVq7QNr4pc-pn2-FevSC9tcSV0v@localhost> <Bd1D8ggkpXsj-pn2-DcwghRWdjFKB@Tobias> <stfVq7QNr4pc-pn2-0hDYlHUVbT2J@localhost> <Bd1D8ggkpXsj-pn2-yjXnODBdECR1@Tobias> <slrnim8ie9.t3d.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu> <slrnim8m92.1cdt.abuse@news.pr.network> <slrnim9elu.u1i.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu> <IU.D20110224.T081209.P54640.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> <slrnimj95r.m63.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu> <slrnioubak.n0q.abuse@news.pr.network> |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:15:48 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="LlLjF8LevGdIZWbTvv+SXA"; logging-data="23161"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UHU5lRTJIGT2DA6zU4v2x" |
| User-Agent | slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:dU4rwQaSTC+3lhYJT1s/rleeosU= |
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.os2.programmer.misc:125 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2011-03-27, Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote: >> Get a clue! Most of multimedia file formats are "defined" by the most >> common implementations (even when formal specifications exist - which >> I'm not absolutely sure was applicable to RIFF from the start). And >> this uint_32 would be immediately converted to off_t, which for more >> than a decade would be just signed_int_32. > Why would anybody in their right mind want to turn an unsigned length > field to a signed offset? I see. You do not know the signature of the corresponding OS APIs... > Well, I suppose you would, but then you seem to be deranged anyway. Hmm, I wonder why I do not give a damn about what you think of me? Really curious... >> LOL! If you think so, feel free to risk damage to your audio >> equipment and/or your hearing by piping raw audio. > > More bullshit. How does piping data damage your audio equipment/hearing? > And yes, I do know what you are really getting at. So could not you decide whether you know or not before posting? I see, this would not give you a possiblity to demonstrate your rudeness and lack of understanding of the issues involved... > That's why it makes sense to tell the far end explicitly what it's > receiving. Yes. And the only reliable way is to include it in the stream. Yours, Ilya
Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Writing WAV files through a pipe Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-03-30 00:15 +0000 Re: Writing WAV files through a pipe Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2011-04-03 12:57 +0000
csiph-web