Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe11.ams2.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail From: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc Subject: Re: best os2 version for development? References: <0444ba1085137b2f54a3f41d5ddc8c29@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Lines: 6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.20.254.174 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe11.ams2 1303326389 86.20.254.174 (Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:06:29 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:06:29 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:03:24 +0100 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.os2.misc:359 comp.os.os2.programmer.misc:208 > In your case, I would lean toward Warp 4 myself. > Not if xe's planning to use OpenWatcom C/C++. It doesn't work on OS/2 Warp 4.0. I laid out the gory details at length in the OpenWatcom developers newsgroup some years ago.