Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.ecomstation > #1145
| Subject | Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-10, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.os.os2.ecomstation |
| References | (9 earlier) <061120181234479589%nospam@nospam.invalid> <IwkED.534647$MK2.144959@fx35.iad> <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-Qx8GjmzdYtGy@localhost> <HbKED.641702$cL2.249511@fx43.iad> <2c3FD.470394$um3.243911@fx32.iad> |
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
| Message-ID | <f96FD.309760$SG2.132401@fx29.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | 2018-11-08 21:19 -0500 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 2018-11-08 5:58 p.m., Dave Yeo wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: >> I never had the chance to use OS/2 for any significant length of time >> since my hardware - when OS/2 was still competing - wasn't good enough >> to run it and because the system itself seemed fairly counterintuitive >> to me. Add the fact that software was scarce and there truly was little >> reason to use it, IMO. My experience with IBM itself, at the time, was >> also fairly negative so I'm not convinced that the PC platform would >> have been better off had it won the race over Windows either. > > I used it with substandard hardware (386 with 4MBs) by stripping it > down. No WPS was the big thing. Originally I used it as a DOS > replacement and it worked very well. Wanted to download stuff from a BBS > while doing other stuff, OS/2 just worked. Wanted to run 2+ Win3.1 > programs without one crashing and taking the other down, OS/2 allowed > that, while downloading from a BBS. > Generally OS/2 was a better DOS and Windows. Used a better file system > with better caching, making it faster much of the time. Want to run and > multi-task multiple Win (and/or DOS) programs, OS/2 did it well. > Eventually I got more ram and a faster processor (33Mhz 486 DLC that > plugged into my 386 board) and started using the WPS and native programs > and never looked back. > Typing this on OS/2 running on real hardware. If I remember correctly, I only really used it on a 386DX-33 with 4MB of RAM and I was underwhelmed but I definitely didn't strip it down to make it more usable. I was also in my mid-teens at the time and I wasn't concerned with the computer being useful as much as I was with it doing nifty things. It's too bad it didn't become more popular than it did but IBM can only really blame itself. However, OS/2 is still technically being developed as far as I know. Dunno if eComstation is still the only company providing OS/2 support though. Apparently, someone else is producing an OS/2-based system. -- SilverSlimer Minds: @silverslimer
Back to comp.os.os2.ecomstation | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2018-11-07 18:58 +0000
Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:04 -0500
Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-11-07 17:13 -0800
Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 14:58 -0800
Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 21:19 -0500
Re: No. 1 paid utility in Mac App Store steals browser history, sends it to Chinese server SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 21:25 -0500
csiph-web