Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.msdos.djgpp > #9985
| Date | 2026-01-10 11:10 +0200 |
|---|---|
| Message-Id | <86ikd9al4r.fsf@gnu.org> |
| From | "Eli Zaretskii (eliz@gnu.org) [via djgpp@delorie.com]" <djgpp@delorie.com> |
| Subject | Re: Supported debug info formats |
| References | <0752ebcc-24dd-4ea1-ad68-7822463d0eda@polymtl.ca> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Organization | None provided |
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:25:50 -0500 > From: "Simon Marchi (simon.marchi@polymtl.ca) [via djgpp@delorie.com]" <djgpp@delorie.com> > > GDB maintainer here. I'm in the process of cleaning up obsolete things, > like debug info formats that are not longer relevant. I am now looking > at COFF [1]. I am wondering if this is still useful for DJGPP, or if > nowadays you can use DWARF like most other targets (or if people use GDB > for DJGPP at all). > > In the gcc source code [1] I see this, so I guess that DWARF 2 is the > default debug format now? GCC tossed COFF debug info some time ago, so I think it's okay to remove that from GDB as well. We used to need this for building the DJGPP port of Emacs, but that is no longer required, since the next release 31.1 of Emacs will no longer force or need the -gcoff switch to GCC. So that reason is also no more valid.
Back to comp.os.msdos.djgpp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Supported debug info formats "Simon Marchi (simon.marchi@polymtl.ca) [via djgpp@delorie.com]" <djgpp@delorie.com> - 2026-01-09 12:25 -0500 Re: Supported debug info formats "Eli Zaretskii (eliz@gnu.org) [via djgpp@delorie.com]" <djgpp@delorie.com> - 2026-01-10 11:10 +0200 Re: Supported debug info formats "Robert Sundling (rjs-djgpp@zensoft.com) [via djgpp@delorie.com]" <djgpp@delorie.com> - 2026-01-12 16:50 -0600
csiph-web