Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc > #29
| From | gerotica <pgerotica@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc |
| Subject | Re: Independent network for each ethernet adapter |
| Date | 2011-02-04 10:33 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <e6e42ed3-2956-4b37-9411-34173c024a4f@c10g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <b86ae0c0-3bb1-4794-b423-3deca502c213@d2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <5jos18-up4.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> <d1b187df-75fe-48e0-91d3-60ffa161ff0b@p11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> |
On 4 fev, 12:26, gerotica <pgerot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 fev, 06:06, Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > gerotica wrote: > > > I have several brand new network routers I need to update firmware via > > > telnet. [...] several ethernet cards on one pc and be able to connect > > > one router to each one of them. Of course, the main problem is that > > > those routers come with the same default ip address and subnet mask. > > > Is there anyway to do this? Connect several routers with same ip to > > > the pc, and still be able to communicate to each one? > > > Generally, no, you can't have one machine with several network cards on the > > same IP address. Things to try: > > 0. Install virtual machines and connect each of them to a real ethernet > > card. This is just a vague idea, I'm not even sure if this works and is > > supported, let alone by which machine. > > 1. If you configure your ethernet cards to have consecutive numbers in the > > same subnet that the routers are by default. You could then bind() your > > outgoing connection to exactly that ethernet address instead of letting the > > IP-stack pick one for you. Of course, you can't use telnet that way (unless > > it allows such things, which I doubt for the MS-supplied one) but would > > have to write the TCP transfer code yourself. > > > Good luck! > > > Uli > > > -- > > Domino Laser GmbH > > Geschäftsführer: Thorsten Föcking, Amtsgericht Hamburg HR B62 932 > > Thanks Uli for your ideas. That´s exactly the ways I imagined to do > the job. I have been trying to configure Virtual PC to do it, still > unsucessful. > Binding to the IP, I´ve already did that, but in my understanding, I > can just "hear" what´s going on the wire right? I can´t bind and > manipulate the data being sent or received on that IP, am I wrong? > > Anyway, thanks for your ideas. Having another person thinking that way > makes me feel like I am on the right path. By the way... I managed to solve this problem using Virtual PC. The secret is to have a virtual machine for each ethernet controller you want to use and disable, at the host os, all protocols installed for that controller. Thanks a lot.
Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Independent network for each ethernet adapter gerotica <pgerotica@gmail.com> - 2011-02-04 10:33 -0800 Re: Independent network for each ethernet adapter Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2011-02-07 09:08 +0100
csiph-web