Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc > #33
| From | gerotica <pgerotica@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc |
| Subject | Re: Independent network for each ethernet adapter |
| Date | 2011-02-04 06:26 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <d1b187df-75fe-48e0-91d3-60ffa161ff0b@p11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <b86ae0c0-3bb1-4794-b423-3deca502c213@d2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <5jos18-up4.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> |
On 4 fev, 06:06, Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com> wrote: > gerotica wrote: > > I have several brand new network routers I need to update firmware via > > telnet. [...] several ethernet cards on one pc and be able to connect > > one router to each one of them. Of course, the main problem is that > > those routers come with the same default ip address and subnet mask. > > Is there anyway to do this? Connect several routers with same ip to > > the pc, and still be able to communicate to each one? > > Generally, no, you can't have one machine with several network cards on the > same IP address. Things to try: > 0. Install virtual machines and connect each of them to a real ethernet > card. This is just a vague idea, I'm not even sure if this works and is > supported, let alone by which machine. > 1. If you configure your ethernet cards to have consecutive numbers in the > same subnet that the routers are by default. You could then bind() your > outgoing connection to exactly that ethernet address instead of letting the > IP-stack pick one for you. Of course, you can't use telnet that way (unless > it allows such things, which I doubt for the MS-supplied one) but would > have to write the TCP transfer code yourself. > > Good luck! > > Uli > > -- > Domino Laser GmbH > Geschäftsführer: Thorsten Föcking, Amtsgericht Hamburg HR B62 932 Thanks Uli for your ideas. That´s exactly the ways I imagined to do the job. I have been trying to configure Virtual PC to do it, still unsucessful. Binding to the IP, I´ve already did that, but in my understanding, I can just "hear" what´s going on the wire right? I can´t bind and manipulate the data being sent or received on that IP, am I wrong? Anyway, thanks for your ideas. Having another person thinking that way makes me feel like I am on the right path.
Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Independent network for each ethernet adapter Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2011-02-04 09:06 +0100 Re: Independent network for each ethernet adapter gerotica <pgerotica@gmail.com> - 2011-02-04 06:26 -0800
csiph-web