Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.x > #243
| From | dlbendigo <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> |
|---|---|
| References | <e1rupcFeu8uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Subject | Re:Whatever happened to the Secondary Selection? |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.x, comp.windows.x |
| Organization | eu.thundernews.com |
| Message-ID | <ZT6Dz.1467783$Ex3.896930@fx16.fr7> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-09-17 18:10 +1000 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> Wrote in message: > For over 20 years, I have been using the secondary-selection (a standard > feature of the X-Windows system) when editing texts, using the Solaris > operating system on Sun Hardware. Recently, I have switched to Linux on > i86 hardware. It seems that you are the only one to think it has value. There are two buffers already How many do you need? --
Back to comp.os.linux.x | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Whatever happened to the Secondary Selection? Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> - 2016-08-20 21:01 +0000
Re:Whatever happened to the Secondary Selection? dlbendigo <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-09-17 18:10 +1000
Re:Whatever happened to the Secondary Selection? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-09-17 10:40 -0400
Re: Whatever happened to the Secondary Selection? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-09-18 11:14 +0000
Re:Whatever happened to the Secondary Selection? Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> - 2016-09-27 20:11 +0000
csiph-web