Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?8J+HtfCfh7FKYWNlayBNYXJjaW4gSmF3b3Jza2nwn4e18J+HsQ==?= Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup Subject: Re: NEW: 18. Totaliztic Report - Why I use Kubutnu instead Gentoo Linux? Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 01:45:20 +0200 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net VY8Ib8eiaH93VdyltguZzAxZNQnzvi5nRJXlYwG6BLSvlBAFnf Cancel-Lock: sha1:BxJrBKfQQXIeHVJCNXQ6vVCVCkA= sha256:Mx/5bGQJAil0weiD8QBZL0EA5XNiPZXq3udXgjAvVQk= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:697191 comp.os.linux.setup:4932 W dniu 14.09.2025 o 21:59, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 pisze: > 7. There are many USE flags for individual packages. In my opinion, this > is contrary to the USE flag concept. It seems to me that USE flags > should be divided into system (global) and program (i.e. those > characteristic of a given program). Now they are completely mixed (at > least they were mixed in my /etc/portage/make.conf file); This is not true. There is apparently complete USE flag list under URL: They are divided as "global" - mean system, and as "local" - for given program, lib, or script app. But until now, I was complete unaware about existence this crucial for Gentoo users WWW site, because Gentoo Handbook doesn't mention even single word about it! -- Have a nice day! Jacek Marcin Jaworski, Pruszcz Gd., woj. Pomorskie, PL🇵🇱, EU🇪🇺; tel.: +48-609-170-742, najlepiej w godz.: 5:00-5:55 lub 16:00-16:55; , gpg: EBFD1A464130993FBBC230FE221740E87CE10580; Domowa s. WWW (WYSZUKIWARKI JĄ POMIJAJĄ!!!): ; Mini Netykieta: ; Mailowa Samoobrona: .