Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Ralf Fassel Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: tar problem Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:50:45 +0200 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net UGWhNHePraePeSIA/KbhsAQi7AYcSjGDfM6fEdx99V/xAHmKI= Cancel-Lock: sha1:d81zirjCn8O3NVJebAV7eoCvb84= sha1:+/ewuLppx70uxLuT2CpTv8F7rYo= sha256:ZjPJfKWtvLmTMFNH1mOH9AQgaxKJQNFerbgD8uzyN6I= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:56560 * Richard Kettlewell | Ralf Fassel writes: | > Why do you expect that if you tell tar to use a file named 'NumNotes' | > that it should use a file named 'NumNotes.tar.gz' instead? > | The script they quoted does “tar -xf $1.tar.gz”, i.e. it adds .tar.gz. Ah, sorry for the noise. Hadn't spotted that post. | Presumably the script they are actually running is different. Obviously it is, considering the tar message. Should be trivial to 'type tarx' to find out instead of accusing tar of lying (but creating conspiracy contexts where none exist seems en vogue these days... :-() R'