Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #67197

Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later

From Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later
Date 2025-04-23 12:55 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vuakfb$30bf7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <vu7m0d$8710$3@dont-email.me> <r14kdlxerj.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vu7tke$et8k$1@dont-email.me> <vu7v4i$fsm4$1@dont-email.me> <vu85jq$llhs$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/22/25 14:29, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 22/04/2025 12:38, Pancho wrote:
>> On 4/22/25 12:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 22/04/2025 10:27, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>> On 2025-04-22 11:03, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>> On 22/04/2025 09:35, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-04-21 02:29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21 Apr 2025 08:24:22 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It sounds like they're talking about the cache in the drive itself,
>>>>>>>> making sure data is physically written out before power-off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, you could be right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I say “unfortunately“, because I think it’s a dumb idea for 
>>>>>>> drives to have
>>>>>>> their own cache.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not at all. There is a huge speed improvement.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The key is to have a large enough capacitor in the drive to flush 
>>>>> all those caches on power off.
>>>>
>>>> Or power off by command, not pulling the cable.
>>>>
>>> The reason you pull the cable is
>>>
>>> (i) the electricity company did it for you
>>> (ii) the power off button/command didn't work.
>>> (iii) There was no swap left and you couldn't even log in to issue 
>>> the shutdown command
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My Orange Pi 5 freezes all the time. I don't know if the power off 
>> button is any better than pulling the power cable.
>>
> I have herd several tinmes that orange Pis are not as good as raspberry..
> 

The oPi5 hardware is much better than the rPi5. The oPi5 has 4 extra 
efficiency cores, the oPi5 RK3588 is 8nm, the rPi5 Broadcom BCM2712 is 
16nm. The oPi5 comes with a NVMe socket.

In practice the oPi5 seems faster, and uses about half the power, it 
will run off a normal(ish) USB power plug.

The problem is the OS (I use Armbian) isn't quite as good a rPi5. 
Although the oPi5 is getting better and has open source GPU drivers.

For a GUI/Desktop the rPi5 is still a little buggy compared to Intel/AMD 
Linux. While the rPi/Pi OS is good for a server, I wouldn't recommend 
either it, or the oPi5, as a desktop, unless you like tinkering.

My perception is that the Aarch64 SoC Linux software is improving. Maybe 
the next round of devices will truly be mass market desktops.

>> One thing I have been pondering, is a hardware heartbeat. 
> 
> A watchdog timer?
> 

Yeah, that is the proper name. I see they do provide a service to force 
a reboot. Which I guess is what I wanted.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Shutdown - 25 Years Later Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-04-16 14:32 +0000
  Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2025-04-18 04:34 +0000
    Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-18 05:56 +0000
      Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2025-04-18 06:38 +0000
        Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-18 08:15 +0000
    Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-18 08:53 +0100
      Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-18 08:16 +0000
        Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-04-19 14:19 +0000
          Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2025-04-19 21:10 +0000
            Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-19 22:22 +0000
            Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-20 08:13 +0100
              Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-20 10:31 +0100
              Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-04-20 12:28 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-20 20:44 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-04-21 08:24 +1000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-04-21 08:28 +1000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-21 00:29 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-22 10:35 +0200
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-22 10:03 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-22 11:27 +0200
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-04-22 10:37 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-22 12:13 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-04-22 12:38 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-22 14:29 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-04-23 12:55 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-22 22:49 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-23 19:20 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-24 00:24 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-25 17:50 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-25 23:15 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 07:45 -0700
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-28 20:18 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-29 12:15 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-29 18:29 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-29 21:18 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-29 03:02 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-22 18:20 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-22 22:45 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-22 22:46 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-23 06:29 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-22 22:46 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-22 22:43 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-23 13:35 +0200
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-24 00:23 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-25 23:20 +0200
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-25 23:14 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-26 10:32 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-26 17:08 +0100
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-26 22:52 +0000
      Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-18 10:15 +0100
        Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-19 00:06 +0000
  Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-18 10:41 +0000
    Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:17 -0700
    Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-18 15:29 +0200
  Re: Shutdown - 25 Years Later Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-04-18 19:02 +0000

csiph-web