Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject: Re: Rubber
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:10:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <slrn10knt0c.3fl4n.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <1ipl0mxq5b.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10h9s9u$11cvm$3@dont-email.me> <mprektFfrgiU1@mid.individual.net> <10hbhu6$1di3b$11@dont-email.me> <JzCdnUYVx_m1z6T0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <pgiq0mxsfg.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <mq0r1uFcdl6U2@mid.individual.net> <2rit0mxofv.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <mq37p1Fp7k8U1@mid.individual.net> <vf711mx7lr.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10hu90n$3fold$1@dont-email.me> <4hae1mxvct.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <mqjurhFiooeU3@mid.individual.net> <0dt9kklgum5gv5l3r9m3j3th2ntvp1hstp@4ax.com> <v35g1mxvv1.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <1l-dndF71dlS-dv0nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <lkhi1mxqq1.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10i6m8i$252ev$1@dont-email.me> <ZVD1R.398$WOOa.17@fx41.iad> <mqp2quFdqp5U8@mid.individual.net> <87zf7c4fg7.fsf@comcast.net.invalid>
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c6f979794804e771976b240b9f587248"; logging-data="1463480"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18D9vVRx318UcbPDv7IwTzBiN+uK3ETz+EYwi/SWMmhIg=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hNQ4eqb9GVS5WJvPS49xH1DyTBY=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:79797 alt.comp.os.windows-11:28867

Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> wrote at 04:38 this Sunday (GMT):
> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 20:45:45 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>
>>> Back in the '60s I heard someone mention that he had bought Timex
>>> watches for each of his three sons.  All three lasted the 12-month
>>> warranty period, but not one made it to 13 months.  Looks like the
>>> engineers got that one pretty well figured out.
>>
>> I've been wearing a fitness tracker for a couple of years but my old Timex 
>> Expedition took a licking and kept on ticking. It's a little scarred but 
>> it's still keeping time. No complaints. The Zulu band is bulletproof too. 
>>
>>
> I have a Casio digital watch that I don't even know how old it is, but
> it's at least 45-50 years at a guess. The buttons have gotten stiff over
> the years, so the functions like stopwatch and lap timer don't work well
> any more, but it does just exactly what I need from a quick glance at my
> wrist: it tells me the day of the week, the date, and time of day.
>
> And I have only had to replace the battery about 4 times in all those
> years. 


If it ain't broke, don't fix it
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom