Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Allodoxaphobia Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Case Insensitive File Systems -- Torvalds Hates Them Date: 3 Jun 2025 12:57:36 GMT Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20250428080014.0000347f@gmail.com> <20250428111242.00007426@gmail.com> <101gt61$1s439$2@dont-email.me> <101j4nq$2udcb$2@dont-email.me> <101jq1q$36qt0$1@dont-email.me> <87v7pe54dl.fsf@atr2.ath.cx> <101lamu$3ijbt$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: If_you_must-Reply_to@my.sig.adr X-Trace: individual.net ybHgV3xwizwINs7d3ATn8Q2lmPtJwSnGKQ6Hx1DOQ2vDgFPWtG Cancel-Lock: sha1:7HUAF7hYHS4OvUB3xJPcPjQrkR4= sha256:fl96sO8RxRRtnYDza8uEyukjwOpDCQhgW4RgSAIsmzc= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:68244 On 2 Jun 2025 23:58:37 GMT, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:05:02 +0100, Nuno Silva wrote: >> On 2025-06-02, jayjwa wrote: >>> Nuno Silva writes: >>> >>>> I have never seen a Unicode-capable terminal myself, and, while I've >>>> not done much sampling, I doubt they're in any way common or frequent. >>> Xterm, foot, urxvt, konsole, xfce term....pretty much every modern >>> terminal. >> >> (Do note that these - at least the ones whose names I recognize (I've >> never heard of one named "foot") - are terminal *emulators*, not >> terminals.) > > Not many ADM-3As around anymore... I have a DEC VT-52 that 'should' work. It was last turned on in the previous century. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | Marvin | W3DHJ.net | linux 38.238N 104.547W | @ jonz.net | Jonesy | FreeBSD