Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Favorite Font
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:50:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <slrn100508d.2j5qk.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <1835a5c81ceedfd3$44418$19313$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <20250414092849.00004cdd@gmail.com> <pan$630f$11fc0600$4376005a$ad574581@linux.rocks> <20250415123306.00001fd1@gmail.com> <slrnvvvdsr.3gc99.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <20250416080602.00006325@gmail.com> <slrn1002jo5.54u.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <20250417123449.00005f16@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="632654894c959a9cb869bbfa151f31f3"; logging-data="3607541"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bLI11vyzjqknwwBsW++qr+J9Th+0FELFQflEoakMGag=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XFa9hPvOfgnoWGild6NBLkjIILg=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:689182 comp.os.linux.misc:67158

John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 19:34 this Thursday (GMT):
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:00:03 -0000 (UTC)
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> wrote:
>
>> > True enough - never liked those, either. I'd actually put the FOSS
>> > Alternatives (TM) over both, in a head-to-head; it just doesn't make
>> > Liberation *aesthetically pleasing,* is all.  
>> 
>> Again, theyre Just Fine.
>
> They're perfectly functional; I just don't find them particularly
> pleasant/beautiful, which was the initial point of discussion.

Fair enough, sorry.

>> Wow, you wrote a novel? Can we see?
>
> It's under another 'nym on another corner of the 'Net that I try to
> keep separate-ish, but if you drop me a line on my personal e-mail I
> might not mind sharing ;)


maybe
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom