Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The Horrible Future : China - Holographic Cashless ATMs Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:19 +0200 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <7S2dna3ARMc3CVb1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <10ah4gi$3tlsl$1@dont-email.me> <10aq70m$22nft$2@dont-email.me> <10ask51$2lq0s$2@dont-email.me> <7g0aqlx0qp.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10atqp0$2tidd$7@dont-email.me> <9rcaqlx33q.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10av69k$393b7$5@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net IUsTuEPhu9lIiG9FsVfWMQ/J/OuaM419y3SNnkm6EytVffQXm5 X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:UcioaDUx1/JwfQ/5URf6KeWPJoQ= sha256:O6Yg68AzwPE1eITT+UbpuaCMhC+ZjcdlGoKowAajddQ= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:75095 On 2025-09-24 05:09, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 22:17:25 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 13:28:09 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>> But yes, the reasons everybody suspects are bank commissions and tax >>> avoidance. >> >> “Tax avoidance” is different from “tax evasion”. The first one is not >> paying tax that you don’t have to; the second one is not paying tax that >> you *do* have to. >> >> The first one is legal; the second one is not. Oh! > And you need a good lawyer to tell the difference... Dick the Butcher had > it right. Ah, then I feel better, thanks :-) -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;