Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-11 Subject: Re: Nuclear plants. Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:33:15 +0200 Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: <10a6nt3$1c65i$1@dont-email.me> <10a9qlq$25h61$1@dont-email.me> <10ac80j$2nuve$1@dont-email.me> <10ac8lq$2nkob$2@dont-email.me> <68d087a6@news.ausics.net> <10ar9d9$2a86g$1@dont-email.me> <68d1d3e6@news.ausics.net> <10atuhj$2tidd$15@dont-email.me> <68d333e6@news.ausics.net> <8vvdqlxsif.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10b30b0$5u19$14@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net rPQR0EtVYTKh5s1Mf90bEgfMQSV/i5z7VX2FXgeSPxUtqLui1j X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:EfQZ7xPByu2HuLhk8CB4YoZIETA= sha256:4T+/NSE0Sge0W/xho1M8yA/p1IbGF+xEn967JKXgSXc= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: <10b30b0$5u19$14@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:75192 alt.comp.os.windows-11:24533 On 2025-09-25 11:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 24/09/2025 21:12, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2025-09-24 01:57, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>> In comp.os.linux.misc The Natural Philosopher >>> wrote: >>>> On 22/09/2025 23:55, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> >> >>> >>>> In particular when the 1960s reactors were built the regulatory >>>> framework was very light and governments wanted them built,. The real >>>> death knell was Germany, the Green party, proportional representation, >>>> and Chernobyl. >>> >>>  From what I remember "Germany" was largely a reaction to Fukushima. >> >> Indeed. >> >> It was my turning point, and that of many people. >> >> When Chernobyl exploded we though: that's Russian inefficiency. >> Communists are corrupt and imbecile. Then years later comes Fukushima >> disaster. No communists there to blame. State of the art "western" >> industry. >> > > The tsunami killed 20,000 people > No one died at the nuclear plant. There is long term radiation disease and deaths to account for. > The safety systems all performed as designed. > There was no disaster. Oh yes, there was. > It was a very old design of reactor indeed > It simply had not been designed for a once in a thousand years tsunami. Oh. So now you tell me to trust other designs, that they will be "safe"? That _nothing_ bad will ever happen? > > Now nuclear plants are. > > But the main thing was that the press made the nuclear meltdown a > 'disaster' and completely ignored the fact that far far more death and > destruction had been caused by the tsunami itself. The nuclear incident > was a mere footnote. > > More clear evidence of anti-nuclear propaganda, is hard to find. > > > > -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;