Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Linux to be illegal in California? Date: 19 May 2026 04:52:59 GMT Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <10u03i7$4nle$1@dont-email.me> <10u2bjn$7tk9$1@dont-email.me> <6a07822e$0$3165$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <9cgldmx07m.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <6a083913$0$7108$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <10uggku$2uu1g$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net WqQ8P1QL7RbSB397gitVjwyVbTJXluhvPHJqvxid4x95p7txc7 Cancel-Lock: sha1:4sS9d6f1+CWr+cbooMSX4mW+vEk= sha256:JZQxedsx3uV/UsMGDj4FYr9PY2nDmv5nKLwmUrsufUQ= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:86891 On Tue, 19 May 2026 02:07:27 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2026 12:37:12 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: > >> Its when we in Australia have to toe American cultural lines, and often >> they are the East/West Coast Liberal Elite ideas. > > Amusing to hear you describe *any* USians as “liberal”. I know they see > themselves that way, but realistically, as far as the rest of the world > is concerned (e.g. here in NZ), what we would call “centrist” is what > they would call “socialist”. I read an essay in a paleoconservative magazine where the author suggested 'right-liberal' to reflect the original meaning. I don't think that would work. It would be as confusing as left and right libertarians.