Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The Stupidification Of systemd Haters Date: 14 May 2026 23:46:03 GMT Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <18ae97fc33e48f9d$12583$2923323$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10ttm9k$1g1he$6@dont-email.me> <10tvbbj$1vrb3$1@dont-email.me> <10u07tq$29ejq$1@dont-email.me> <502edmx1hk.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10u22vt$2odeg$4@dont-email.me> <6a0510b6@news.ausics.net> <10u45ke$2056$6@dont-email.me> <10u48nh$2056$11@dont-email.me> <10u4cbh$2056$16@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 3rPaDAaZsJNwexebieFuQQiBHjaAr+BKK7O7YWgd/9sUrBOUAb Cancel-Lock: sha1:oF5fkm/26tWDkJEbJzHBzTdTA7s= sha256:fs8JgTQQYOvXQI+HIilkAtPyaVkymy6livohCKNAsSI= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:86683 On Thu, 14 May 2026 18:06:17 +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > There’s an advantage to running different compilers too: the warnings > they generate highlight different issues with the code. So more > different compilers = more warnings = more opportunities to spot bugs > before they reach the customers. Until the early 2000s most sites were AIX and they then switched to Windows. We used the MKS NutCracker software to run what essentially was Linux software, including an X server and Motif GUIs on Windows. We dropped the AIX build but continued to build with gcc on Linux and cl on Microsoft. Indeed there were differences, One of the major problems with the AIX to Linux move was AIX was very forgiving of NULL references and Linux has no sense of humor.