Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.usage.english Subject: Re: GNU Date: 31 Mar 2026 21:29:19 GMT Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <10pfhm2$aqf5$1@dont-email.me> <1rsaj4d.rtb8ajbdoy69N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <10pkqka$22prd$1@dont-email.me> <10ppr5m$3m2br$1@dont-email.me> <10pr6gg$2t5v$1@dont-email.me> <10pv2af$1eb4h$2@dont-email.me> <87zf3wx1jt.fsf@parhasard.net> <10pvhqb$1j2vg$1@dont-email.me> <1rsjtwr.9h8wo7a6jjujN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <10q2o7j$nr7l$1@news1.tnib.de> <1rsostx.1fumdje1pdrftiN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <1rsoqz0.19zzbh71ebfb7bN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <18a11176d0ed8bfb$1717$2710841$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10q9dle$u3sq$1@dont-email.me> <1rspefm.1yoofvr1xiiol1N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <10qc65n$1silm$23@dont-email.me> <10qdl7r$2cbhu$4@dont-email.me> <10qgd63$3aete$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net cGKp6j0uY8mb9n0O4d4eAwdV/6iyGkbM2+kHmnb+6GyvSUATRt Cancel-Lock: sha1:mM0k+S4vG7C9VaJ1GUZySX5iNsk= sha256:UQnTg/AyQJKeKi8+8p6/GCGc3nWPgRRupz3y8VkZDcQ= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:84917 alt.usage.english:1141859 On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:03:15 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > I had one of those., Not very good engines - 950cc I think. The 1100 and > 1275cc models were a lot better. I could get about 95 out of my slightly > uprated 1275. The early Mark IIs were a bit of a crap shoot as they used up spare parts. Mine had the 1098 engine but not the disk front brakes. Without a GPS and going by the questionable speedometer it could get up to about 80 given a very long straight and no headwind.