Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Over-Elaborate Shell Scripting Date: 12 Mar 2026 20:18:59 GMT Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <10otpi4$1opu8$3@dont-email.me> <10otrqi$1p9ft$1@dont-email.me> <10ou2q9$1qp29$1@dont-email.me> <10oucet$vo4d$2@news.xmission.com> <10ouhk5$22anv$1@dont-email.me> <20260312095816.00001163@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net salb7192GPmrewn4R13n7gwJNPrUaRTxcjwcu4JmoW0IRHBwcg Cancel-Lock: sha1:AyG5MGn3D8lanjnLMF2jIy6W60k= sha256:nSekdk91ZrhfdU7ZJupm+N79s276RgNqVRtexJXef4k= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.unix.shell:26664 comp.os.linux.misc:82895 On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:38:13 -0000 (UTC), Jim Jackson wrote: > I've found perl to be a lot more useful for that sort of thing. I > suppose if were starting now I'd be using python. But in the 90's eprl > was the goto scripting language for C programmers. That was the '90s... It took me a while to warm up to Python but it became the scripting language for GIS applications. It certainly was better than VBA. Pike is good too but never caught on.