Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.usage.english Subject: Re: GNU Date: 6 Mar 2026 06:12:45 GMT Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <10o629v$1qssb$1@dont-email.me> <10o6emj$1uql3$5@dont-email.me> <20260303111343.00000572@gmail.com> <20260304080130.000068c7@gmail.com> <10oab0q$39n4f$6@dont-email.me> <10ocqti$4fas$3@dont-email.me> <10od9kg$9cih$1@dont-email.me> <10odgc1$b9f5$2@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net zp8TYQYO7aEEvzhH8GLbcQHp46US6HGoHXvbDoZwmL+ag+b7h3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:77ur8Qvc/7B0HmUnNHMj7ECizIE= sha256:cnGRYI/updR5Zqa2bIxJ7dmXbVTUD9aRxiMJ+1xw6uw= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:82454 alt.usage.english:1138532 On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 03:06:41 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 01:11:44 +0000, Phil wrote: > >> On 05/03/2026 21:00, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> Can anybody explain “Nucular”? >> >> Not me. It's one of my pet peeves, along with 'homogenous', 'intregal' >> and 'disect'. > > You prefer “homo genius” do you? I remember that used to raise titters > in a certain maths class ... Are we talking about homogenous or homogeneous? > So, is it “dill-emma” or “die-lemma”? For me, not dill-emma but I vary between a long and short 'i'. 'tetralemma' is easier to figure out. I doubt anyone would say te-tral`- emma.