Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Something Wrong With DebiVerse FFmpeg Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:48:05 +0100 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <10n59lv$2vl2m$2@dont-email.me> <10n5pqt$350ql$1@dont-email.me> <10n8ojd$3uu6$1@dont-email.me> <10naqa9$q4tf$3@dont-email.me> <10nb2mq$sp74$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net qvA5226E5Crf4jSzyjSYLAcdBv/U6Cat7OMiS66+C70Bjnv1O/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:ibzaQzJiRJBqUMW0OOwVhN12F6E= sha256:dNcbhBtxYAeYBmKWZwjhPEAa5lk3Wyu71QbFW/Ukgyw= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-CA, es-ANY In-Reply-To: <10nb2mq$sp74$3@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:82151 On 2026-02-21 02:44, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 01:38:38 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: > >> On 2026-02-21 00:21, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:26:31 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>> >>>> On 2026-02-20 05:40, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>>>> >>>>> # ./configure --enable-gpl ... --enable-nonfree ... >>>> >>>> Both are present in the openSUSE rpm. >>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> license='nonfree and unredistributable' >>> >>> I wonder how they can redistribute it, then ... >> >> I told you how. It is distributed by another group outside of the >> company, using a server in a country with friendly legislation. > > “Piracy-friendly” legislation? Not signatories to the Hague > Convention, then? Maybe not recognizing software patents. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;