Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #81977
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: For those arguing over languages... |
| Date | Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:49:21 +0100 |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <mv5phhFiljoU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <10mesjc$3gnr9$1@dont-email.me> <azKdnRQU0p54ZRb0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10mij0u$rimo$1@dont-email.me> <mv4dtrFbh74U1@mid.individual.net> <wwvv7g270br.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 4YI2rzIyEWNuUSlz4LWEQQhk9sWgzZu3MvdYkaZ9jyrwaRI7Nv |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:V6F5zRNG6f9s8UsvTNxXiCITkaY= sha256:VEZvG7SyVtWofogw6642flJNtcWZyLmIavbxyj5oHPg= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Content-Language | en-CA, es-ANY |
| In-Reply-To | <wwvv7g270br.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:81977 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2026-02-12 10:55, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> writes:
>> In the example posted:
>>
>> The user types in a password, which gets checked against
>> a database, character by character. Once the first character
>> doesn't match, an error message is returned.
>>
>> ...the fault is not of the compiler, but of the programmer. He has to
>> examine all characters even if he knows there is no point.
>
> Obviously you didn’t read the whole article...
I didn't :-)
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 09:09 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 13:11 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2026-02-10 14:08 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-10 15:16 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 16:19 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 18:20 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-10 11:22 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... John <john@panix.com> - 2026-02-17 16:23 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-19 19:26 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-22 09:28 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-02-10 08:24 -0800
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 18:16 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-10 22:34 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 18:50 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-11 19:28 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 21:27 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 09:48 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 20:48 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-11 16:24 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 22:45 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 12:42 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-11 23:24 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-11 22:48 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 22:49 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 09:55 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-12 11:49 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 20:54 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-13 03:20 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 23:44 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 12:38 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-12 15:14 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-12 17:23 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-12 19:52 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-13 10:11 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-13 10:20 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-13 10:10 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-13 19:57 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 20:56 -0500
csiph-web