Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: C/C++ timeline (was Re: Python: A Little Trick For Every Need) Date: 5 Feb 2026 17:33:10 GMT Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <10kl2sr$8rkl$3@dont-email.me> <31stmk1pd8a7q0ekv0is4bd1l5aorcgo95@4ax.com> <9hlumk1lodkjlm9a6egbo2fa79f85v6mad@4ax.com> <10lqdk2$n03u$1@dont-email.me> <10lrt1t$16vf1$1@dont-email.me> <-EOdnRUZmNTqQx_0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10lvc6a$2a0lm$4@dont-email.me> <10lvt12$2g653$1@dont-email.me> <10m0915$2ka88$5@dont-email.me> <10m0fnd$2n7r1$3@dont-email.me> <10m25v7$36k4g$3@dont-email.me> <10m2855$38cir$2@dont-email.me> <10m2b84$30icq$1@dont-email.me> <20260205080604.00002be0@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 0wevI1t1ULDxC1o8dylFTAgGyPvt4c9vKJ0luj/GgJfi4IcUfb Cancel-Lock: sha1:iHL+7C4rvSiI5rMKRSIXjaB/o7E= sha256:Mn5I654lKoWiOk8cvquSt4F88qOW2zqTLa20DbBg0QY= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:81780 On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:06:04 -0800, John Ames wrote: > Seven years, then, is a comfortable approximation, but you could argue > that the gap was either much longer or much shorter. I'd have to go > digging further to get a better notion of *A.* how long it took after > Richie's first efforts for C to be in general use, and *B.* whether C++ > saw much use at all before the '85 standard. The real problem was 'The C++ Programming Language' in 1985 was a reference for Stroustrup's use of the language, not a standard. If you can find a 1st or 2nd edition it really is 'C with Classes' more than what the language became.