Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: C structure portability, naughty Python Date: 7 Jan 2026 20:17:54 GMT Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <10j9a1l$1toj$1@gal.iecc.com> <10j9vvr$23cp$2@gal.iecc.com> <10jb0is$172cb$2@dont-email.me> <679q2mx7o4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10jduat$22c54$1@dont-email.me> <20260105092034.000079fd@gmail.com> <10jhbel$3993m$4@nntp.eternal-september.org> <10jhk5p$3c9r2$1@nntp.eternal-september.org> <10jhmm2$3c9r2$6@nntp.eternal-september.org> <20260106081414.000024c8@gmail.com> <3Wc7R.1392882$ACS3.1392197@fx17.iad> <10jla5d$h5hi$4@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net ocPlSymyxtilEywEAXtAsAaF7+1dVJz6RhYUmXvlYXrWBmeMT3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:eZl85/04bjxsEuykCTutlGqJAPQ= sha256:D7z6wZjSI5jxxyvAn0ZrjGV/6XK/A/FtQ1FJOcZ5LkU= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:80697 alt.folklore.computers:233346 On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:48:29 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 06/01/2026 18:57, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> remember the >> "baud" vs "bps" confusion. > IIRC the are not , strictly, the same thing... They usually were back in the 1200 baud days. Then things got complicated.