Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Naughty =?UTF-8?B?Q+KZrw==?= Date: 6 Jan 2026 19:06:37 GMT Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <679q2mx7o4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10jduat$22c54$1@dont-email.me> <10jelfq$2apo7$4@dont-email.me> <8pI6R.1243340$79B9.1051909@fx14.iad> <10jguou$341pn$1@nntp.eternal-september.org> <10jiufh$1an77$1@paganini.bofh.team> <10jjc9s$3uhtk$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net bceMcAVonDWaH6vP0X96FwIGT67ZDQfZAe7qfzxNnvB/QCHDQy Cancel-Lock: sha1:5CjEmRNM4P0gtWPjV20D02ZCyc4= sha256:njg8axxSiYkDBxjdTQwb5xBP2ueQGH4UfxnMoBQayBs= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:80605 alt.folklore.computers:233275 On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 11:12:44 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Waldek Hebisch wrote this post by blinking in Morse code: > >> In alt.folklore.computers c186282 wrote: >> >>> Hmm ... look at all the GNU 'compilers' - >>> FORTRAN, COBOL, Ada, 'D', M2, Rust,C++, G++, even Algol-68. None are >>> 'compilers' per-se, but to-'C' TRANSLATORS. So, 'C', pretty much All >>> Are One And One Is All. >> >> No. Compiler as first stage translate given language to a common >> representation. This representatiton is different than C. Ada and GNU >> Pascal have parametrized types, there is nothing like that in C. >> >> >> >> C++ (and some other languages) >> have exceptions, C do not have them. > > What about setjmp()/longjmp() ? Let's not forget sigsetjmp and siglongjmp. They're very useful or dangerous depending on skill level.