Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: DUC[KT] tape Date: 3 Jan 2026 21:35:56 GMT Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <10j61ja$3hv7b$1@dont-email.me> <7cadnTFwKKy978r0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <10jakoq$13ji1$5@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net CSp8L8vx99ayKBIip3vvSQhsB6gnzwwTkCzP0UTPrynUv4kOsC Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zx92Nkm6wlgvavYRuqaHP8Bo6Fc= sha256:qrzxI/yXFAdy2EaZcinwMq1Z5NSekG1j7BfWuiIlxsU= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:80434 On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 08:42:02 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/01/2026 02:39, c186282 wrote: >> On the flip, the USA currency system IS far more >>   clear than traditional British - 'decimal'. > > The traditional British was not 'decimal' That's for sure. I never did figure out pence, shillings, quid, bob, pounds, and so forth, between the base system and the informal names. Somehow I wound up with a 5 pence piece that was masquerading as a US dime. It's not uncommon to get Canadian coins but I've not idea how that one got introduced.