Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: DUC[KT] tape
Date: 3 Jan 2026 01:59:43 GMT
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <mrrbgfF6n51U9@mid.individual.net>
References: <jAadnVZDy90Jxc_0nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <QFedneBAf6wYNs_0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <h96h2m-lc1.ln1@otis.foo> <10j61ja$3hv7b$1@dont-email.me> <7cadnTFwKKy978r0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrn10lfmmb.95fc.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <Oeycnc1PLpf0fMr0nZ2dnZfqn_rV4p2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net j90Nc242KMMXbU/mYXrr4gBVuf0Oij3/Ryxnz8oSrJv+8eX6No
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mLemj7R8E/mPVcLRVZzzqpTFlhQ= sha256:92PpzzmTNSnkPVQdXiJRE7JQfaSYpwd4dbEyj2Izw+g=
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:80382

On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 10:16:41 -0500, c186282 wrote:

>    I think "DUCK tape" became a legal brand-name. Ergo other makers
>    couldn't call their stuff "Duck".

In 1980..  A lot of ducts got taped before that.