Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: language design, naughty Python Date: 3 Jan 2026 00:17:42 GMT Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <10j5ojt$3etcd$4@dont-email.me> <10j92sd$v2e$2@gal.iecc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net m3vsmZU4Waq67NEgjqqbxgnUjZntM31zSc9yICQwYxkopLOcW4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:w5gITcvyrvve5Zqt1Uk/X6U0uH8= sha256:YhYybMUqrMOP0TGgRT4bX0EiPg0PXYIasm3O1tKWNK8= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:80368 alt.folklore.computers:233094 On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 15:15:53 -0500, c186282 wrote: > I *like* to make 'perfect' structuring that will handle anything, but > at times there was time pressure to "make it work" and I could not > spend days/weeks trying to get it 'just perfect'. We had a couple of programmers who tried to handle all possible eventualities. Typically the eventualities never evidenced or whatever the theoretical future does, leaving a very complex piece of code to do the task at hand. Solve tomorrow's problems tomorrow.