Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The Web (HTML) Sux
Date: 27 Dec 2025 23:35:57 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <mrb8qsFeoclU8@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan$1354a$29dba635$1499bedc$32bd2208@linux.rocks> <slrn10kdmmu.24buf.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <10i7khm$2e0ab$3@dont-email.me> <10i8lit$2ltf1$1@dont-email.me> <10i8u2b$2p3ha$1@dont-email.me> <69487137@news.ausics.net> <20251222135823.000042ea@gmail.com> <10icgk7$3rvck$1@dont-email.me> <20251222144314.000060d0@gmail.com> <10icj90$3snlp$2@dont-email.me> <20251222153725.000058b6@gmail.com> <10icl7j$3t6jc$2@dont-email.me> <10igm2u$10hm7$1@dont-email.me> <10ihdst$1aaqu$9@dont-email.me> <10ii5u3$1hc1p$1@dont-email.me> <aGh3R.1244$bU7b.761@fx39.iad> <mr5sn3FipgsU1@mid.individual.net> <10ilchu$2eq5v$4@dont-email.me> <mr6vmrFncgtU5@mid.individual.net> <694f0c5a@news.ausics.net> <mr9493F4a15U2@mid.individual.net> <wwv8qeouuj6.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net zONXw7iN+RJbELcuaDe0ZgyRqQz4afmGXEmCLDfJqAP9btfihA
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LDySPvrF5nHAJyv+Si0oyl7oIu0= sha256:dYKtueAnfdsZg2qzwWDLL+hx+yiKbw1xU1eNeOCfU3w=
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:79940

On Sat, 27 Dec 2025 09:46:21 +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote:

> I don’t really disagree with the thrust of the argument, but: if you
> have to return to base for upgrades, that’s a fact about the specific
> applications and/or operating system. Remote and automatic upgrades have
> widely used for decades now.

Part of that is historical. Having a high speed connection is relatively 
recent for emergency services. Workflows get established and change very 
slowly. After 9/11 it was realized that it would be good if agencies could 
communicate with each other. Progress is being made...