Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: More on wifi range - Pi PICO W Oil level sensor Date: 17 Dec 2025 07:58:25 GMT Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <10hbholdi3b0@dont-email.me> <3bor0mxr8h.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10hgqjur3rh@dont-email.me> <4795ac3fd5ad1428f38c093b2b1543ca@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <37391mxgfc.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 572pXBSq/pZavd5Ud+LkqAo/ozo5yQ09wIw0U4gNPtnuQUJkgX Cancel-Lock: sha1:h+hUhRzGH2AZfLzfL3szvPsEV20= sha256:AuydGIA9uq8NuwEZ72bzOZUvEq4/XZ6JFsI/x6ng4C8= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:79362 On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 01:20:14 -0500, c186282 wrote: > Oh, 'solar-rechargers/power-banks' for phones and such, many are > reported to be very UNSAFE, prone to fires. Little/no regulation or > safety features. > Sorry, $19.95 won't buy you everything .... They're probably improved but a friend had a solar device to recharge NiCad AAs. It worked, if you had 4 days to spare in southern Arizona.