Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-11 Subject: Re: The "Standards" Game Date: 1 Dec 2025 19:56:24 GMT Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <106mke5$1di32$1@dont-email.me> <10884l7$173em$1@dont-email.me> <1089ge2$1fvl9$8@dont-email.me> <10g52v4$3o78s$4@dont-email.me> <10g7bqf$j278$2@dont-email.me> <10gd4jq$2ptu7$4@dont-email.me> <10gejtd$39ian$2@dont-email.me> <10gh6dq$83hq$6@dont-email.me> <10gi75s$l23v$2@dont-email.me> <10gjnvp$163o1$4@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net EoSntYQaEVmKDaD44r6HwAA8aUvzYtz2EW1AeZx9ABO4dnPSIj Cancel-Lock: sha1:1OWrLyZAeW5ik1wdfZdk97l78Q8= sha256:dcDhiea9Rg9BXU5yVAvHgbs2VK2gUxO+9jhiVKN3l2Y= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:78158 alt.comp.os.windows-11:27798 On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:43:21 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/12/2025 02:55, c186282 wrote: >> And that's the thing ... too tight/powerful a 'standard' >>   too early on and you undermine 'evolution'. > > You hit on something there., The top down standards creators are > 'creationists' > > The engineers who fiddle till it workls better and then draw up a paper > to say how it works, are Darwinian. Even worse, I've found the Creationists that have hammered out an extensive specification will, by God, implement that specification even when it becomes apparent it isn't working. q.v. F35, Zumwalt, etc.