Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Recent history of vi Date: 16 Nov 2025 19:10:22 GMT Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <10faucd$3p4r1$7@dont-email.me> <10fb5to$3rft5$1@dont-email.me> <10fc4lo$1vq8$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net YkuEO4XCaG6zcwxliYdArAqDIWFg7SLhCP6PtpBzkO3cIvhjP/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:DkXQ2xAcE+kf8vfDPRp7WnmT9dU= sha256:h1i8AttufpBF/kCDjMFPWXNczDH2j6wJmx3QZCaK5PM= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:77643 alt.folklore.computers:232197 On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 09:14:32 +0000, Pancho wrote: > On 11/16/25 00:43, Eli the Bearded wrote: > > >> It's fine to to like nano or emacs or vscode or whatever. But that just >> means you are not coming from a place that can judge my appreciation of >> the features of vi(m). >> >> > Yes, it is a question of taste and not morals. > > My taste includes both vi and vscode. ;-) My taste includes Vim, not vi, and VS Code. There is considerable overlap since the first extension I install into VS Code is 'VSCodeVim is a Vim emulator for Visual Studio Code.'