Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan ) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Recent history of vi (was: Re: Python/C/Pascal ... How To Choose ?) Date: 16 Nov 2025 05:11:07 GMT Organization: loft Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <10fasl6$3p4r1$3@dont-email.me> X-Trace: individual.net E0KRsmkE2xAMktAhqoV+qAK2QnLvhLEjzKxhRvNWYLGDahaqu5 X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:0JUi1xxTQDd8/CzGIwiaC9VN6SI= sha256:HVDf+LJ4ZPkiXiMLGMSMNhVhwqs4MdXW/DM9Vz24AEw= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:77618 alt.folklore.computers:232181 In article <10fasl6$3p4r1$3@dont-email.me>, Lawrence D˙Oliveiro wrote: >On 15 Nov 2025 18:48:51 GMT, Ted Nolan wrote: > >> I find it takes a lot of munging to get vim to *really* work like vi. > >To me, that sounds like someone saying “it takes a lot of munging to get a >Trabant to *really* work like a Morris Minor”. I can’t imagine myself >wanting to use either. Well, squids & kids, but my fingers do vi automatically. Anything else not so much. -- columbiaclosings.com What's not in Columbia anymore..