Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #76697

Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?
Date 26 Oct 2025 01:51:49 GMT
Lines 15
Message-ID <mm5d5lFhd5nU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <sm0y0pmq2qb.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <af-dncJqL6ncZXj1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <7dlhrlxmm6.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <DIednY0Sz4AKzHr1nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10c908i$3600i$2@dont-email.me> <t5qcnTjojILG_3X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <68ea7364$0$12948$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <HLwGQ.254734$7Ika.65933@fx17.iad> <mkvnt4FdgtdU1@mid.individual.net> <68eb8c02$0$24822$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <10d0f0e$1u8bd$1@dont-email.me> <68f40083$0$28050$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <20251020092029.000020b3@gmail.com> <68fcc773$0$417$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <10dirb1$3ei8t$1@dont-email.me> <3%bLQ.1232900$xYr1.349004@fx14.iad>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net QvDrWblwkYCRrALWcieaOwvJm9DUuqWuG0H5z1duoeGqYxEJOM
Cancel-Lock sha1:fyU+yTLWsmpx/L/Ej3n9mRIWyVQ= sha256:spALJ5ntEZXeCyLcgxLTyWBXGs3FHzJDmbWAl12m+8k=
User-Agent Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:76697

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 22:16:31 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> On 2025-10-25, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 25/10/2025 13:49, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>> Some French words are used in English because they sound cool. And
>>> they are far more than what I knew/guessed a few years ago.
>>
>>   Yes. 'Jus' sounds terribly exciting. 'Gravy' doesn't.
> 
> A popular construct on local menus is the phrase "with au jus". That one
> rubs my fur backwards.  Redundant prepositions!

You must love the US southwest with constructions like Rio Grande River.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:16 +0000
  Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:51 +0000
    Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
      Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 08:42 +0000
        Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 09:11 +0000
          Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 10:06 +0000
            Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:25 +0000
        Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 19:48 +0100
          Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:29 +0000
            Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 00:44 +0100
    Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 00:57 -0400
      Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 07:14 +0000
      Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:05 +0000
  Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 02:00 +0000
  Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:02 +0000

csiph-web