Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Warning - Serious 'sudo' Flaw Compromises Security
Date: 17 Oct 2025 17:30:37 GMT
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <mlfcpsF57h4U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <t5qcnTPojIJuBHX1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <10cihiq$23kb8$6@dont-email.me> <10cios3$25sim$2@dont-email.me> <10cj667$29n96$5@dont-email.me> <gRaHQ.184188$6_hb.85411@fx46.iad> <10cjf5m$2cnh5$2@dont-email.me> <SrbHQ.68586$RrE7.59909@fx45.iad> <RI2cnfyQDJK4fnD1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <ml69afFhs47U1@mid.individual.net> <wpKcnVN4_MydQ3P1nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10co09b$3jj2s$11@dont-email.me> <mlagvjFb1aaU2@mid.individual.net> <sE2dnQTUGeA7FW31nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10ctq6e$17cip$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net X5SpnrvcIruEqJR8d8MRXA1ztZR1sR3Dy4WGU0CelHkEHChBqZ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4Lje9AjVWLR+c798GK1Sgf9yTsk= sha256:J+UmZNCMjTDKtnBKdXuUHrGSbngOOmkZ+Bev3Buyqhw=
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:76284

On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:17:18 -0000 (UTC), Rich wrote:

> c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>> 
>>   But, at the time, many were just convinced LISP was *the* language of
>>   "AI" .....
>> 
>> 
> For most of the AI winters, LISP *was* the language of "AI".
> 
> It is only the upcoming AI winter where the AI is not "LISP" based in
> some form or another.

McCarthy's branch of AI was. I can't find what language was used when 
Rosenblatt modeled his Perceptron on a IBM 704. Both FORTRAN and LISP were 
available. The real Perceptron was hardware. 

Minsky snowed on the Perceptron for the first neural network winter.