Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Warning - Serious 'sudo' Flaw Compromises Security Date: 15 Oct 2025 21:11:15 GMT Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <10cdluk$pc59$2@dont-email.me> <1NucnW53DZrMOHH1nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10cihiq$23kb8$6@dont-email.me> <10cios3$25sim$2@dont-email.me> <10cj667$29n96$5@dont-email.me> <10cjf5m$2cnh5$2@dont-email.me> <10co09b$3jj2s$11@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net GEsOBnTlP1SbWGFSKwRSHAn62PQD7Q2/u/FYX8RBZUE9oqRQT3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:XOUh8ohbTDvzfzsPgyDu77O5ma8= sha256:xzasnLFs4vysLdbXIrKICdun7z5oSW8CONzEiax0RqA= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:76204 On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:24:27 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 15/10/2025 00:34, c186282 wrote: >> I suppose there's nothing wrong with CS ... but >>   on the flip, how much good or good stuff comes it either ? >> >>   CS is just a branch of theoretical math. I'd like some figures on >>   how many CS people can write a good old "Hello World". > > None. Formal programming languages don't contain IO. The classic criticism of pure didactic Pascal was it is a language supremely capable of telling secrets to itself. iirc before Common Lisp the original Lisp was just as adept. I/O is messy and impacts the purity of the language.