Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: GOTO Date: 15 Oct 2025 05:53:48 GMT Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <10cdluk$pc59$2@dont-email.me> <1NucnW53DZrMOHH1nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10cihiq$23kb8$6@dont-email.me> <10cios3$25sim$2@dont-email.me> <10cj667$29n96$5@dont-email.me> <10cjvkn$2gnrl$2@dont-email.me> <10cl4mf$2q6c4$8@dont-email.me> <10cl9f1$2rk26$2@dont-email.me> <10cle4g$2t77s$3@dont-email.me> <10cmibd$38hsj$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net RYP2OJbTiLwpWzXlZNjHMQPfRL3dzMCgoi31IZdIS3rmiudcqj Cancel-Lock: sha1:M0YMl1Axkl/Erj7z1Qjo09sEzG0= sha256:JfTOMSzgaT5E+AoP2+zJGNg9aOKRms1s1QFe5PXh5mA= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:76174 On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 23:20:29 +0100, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2025-10-14, rbowman wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:02:24 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> And once you do draw a flow chart it probably is enough to make you >>> realise how to make the code much easier to understand by removing the >>> spaghetti and concentrating on the little meatballs. >> >> If you listen to the computer science experts you will draw a UML >> diagram nobody understands. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Modeling_Language > > I'm confident UML is from software engineering, not computer science :-P Rumbaugh's Ph.D is in computer science. It only takes one bad apple. Booch and Jacobson both have backgrounds in electrical engineering. I think OMT is all on Rumbaugh and that was upstream of UML. I think I have 'Object-Oriented Modeling and Design' around here someplace. All I remember is it wasn't a page turner.