Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75805
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs |
| Date | 2025-10-08 16:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mknigsF1dhpU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <v0-dnQ9xTdpxHnn1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <mkjq23FcvbpU1@mid.individual.net> <af-dnf5qL6m0nHv1nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com> <mkmfu2Fqs1lU1@mid.individual.net> <10c58c9$1fgv6$4@dont-email.me> |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 09:46:01 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > I tend to agree. I always found arduinos to be expensive, and now RP2040 > et al are way cheaper, one wonders what ATMEL is worth any more. Perhaps > what Arduino is, is not so much the hardware, as the expertise in tool > chains, development platforms and the like. The UNO R4 uses the Renesas RA4MI, a Cortex-M4 processor. It isn't your grandfather's UNO. The new UNO Q definitely ain't. The toolchains ans IDEs are a plus. https://arduino-pico.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ There are times when the Pico C++ SDK is necessary but it isn't much fun. Either MicroPython or Arduino Core is more straight forward. From the docs on the UNO Q they are also using Arduino Core/Zephyr RTOS for the STM32. The ST C++ SDK is another one that's not much fun. It's the classic trade off. If you don't need balls to the wall runtime performance faster development time wins.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-06 23:07 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-07 06:25 +0000
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 09:38 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 02:13 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-10-08 07:50 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-10-08 08:11 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 09:46 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-08 16:41 +0000
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 17:56 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 01:54 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-08 16:24 +0000
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 17:38 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:51 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 01:29 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-10-09 09:29 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 13:12 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:20 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:16 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-10-10 08:41 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-10 19:45 +0000
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 00:26 -0400
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-11 06:42 +0000
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 09:42 +0100
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-08 16:22 +0000
Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 09:36 +0100
csiph-web