Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs
Date: 8 Oct 2025 16:24:34 GMT
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <mknhi2F1dhpU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <v0-dnQ9xTdpxHnn1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <mkjq23FcvbpU1@mid.individual.net> <af-dnf5qL6m0nHv1nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com> <mkmfu2Fqs1lU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net mxcrWFX/aaUXj7nw89uh8wmazsDi0VpsLnoZAIuyW+4+RjiS1f
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5dBE/apsIx+UF/QmoD2WE5iHFa8= sha256:jd/WHhoBfb8lZhepxlHzojLrZezXn1k4jQvSOX4ecqY=
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:75802

On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 07:50:36 +0100, Andy Burns wrote:

> c186282 wrote:
> 
>>    The Ards are very good - within their reasonable range. Did many
>>    projects/devices with the 2560s.
>>    Lots of hand-soldered add-on shields.
>> 
>>    But they're not modern FAST.
> 
> I view Arduino as a waning technology, which makes it strange that
> Qualcomm have bought then at this time ...

The UNO Q doesn't look like waning tech to me.