Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Russian Attack Drones Using UK CPUs
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 07:50:36 +0100
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <mkmfu2Fqs1lU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <v0-dnQ9xTdpxHnn1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <mkjq23FcvbpU1@mid.individual.net> <af-dnf5qL6m0nHv1nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net DALB9CB7hv338hJfS19zhwf+DJQaTxQt42x92mzFz60TajnMnB
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7GbYQE9fPtVtZRLTekP89poLEHA= sha256:XHJGIbEsTOT/EcRE3abCMT3OxGe6Tq+t8NynQS72SPw=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <af-dnf5qL6m0nHv1nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:75778

c186282 wrote:

>    The Ards are very good - within their reasonable
>    range. Did many projects/devices with the 2560s.
>    Lots of hand-soldered add-on shields.
> 
>    But they're not modern FAST.

I view Arduino as a waning technology, which makes it strange that 
Qualcomm have bought then at this time ...