Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #73111

Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth
Date 2025-09-03 03:10 +0000
Message-ID <mhpptkF76meU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <V1rsQ.76266$GnW4.51675@fx35.iad> <mhfi0qFfiteU2@mid.individual.net> <qc6cnRIe8Ih4Py_1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <mhh5crFnn8kU6@mid.individual.net> <veJtQ.970632$3yJ3.433337@fx16.iad>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 02 Sep 2025 21:22:35 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> On 2025-08-30, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 03:06:11 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>>
>>>    Tbe original 8088 had all the needed registers.
>>>    Could minimum deliver at LEAST an easy 64k code space and at LEAST
>>>    another 64k data area. A few tricks and .......
>>
>> They mostly followed the bank switching the Z80s were doing but
>> incorporated the memory management into the processor. After all, the
>> i432 was the REAL answer so why get fancy with the Band-Aid.
> 
> "It's a good thing the iAPX432 never took off.  Otherwise a totally
> horrid Intel architecture might have taken over the world."

There truly are worse things than the x86. I think one of the 432 
designers had a computer science degree. That's the kiss of death :)

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-08-29 17:09 +0000
  Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-29 19:18 +0100
    Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-29 23:51 +0000
      Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-30 05:54 +0000
        Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-30 03:06 -0400
          Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-30 08:28 +0100
            Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-30 05:30 -0400
              Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-30 11:59 +0100
                Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-30 08:26 -0400
                Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-30 20:36 +0000
          Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-30 20:31 +0000
            Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-09-02 21:22 +0000
              Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-03 03:10 +0000
      Re: PC/IX, Unix on x86, Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-30 08:13 +0100

csiph-web