Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Older Hardware Still Works Date: 11 Aug 2025 19:35:45 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4vecnYdHDPuMwwT1nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <107ccm9$2e23u$1@news1.tnib.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net ZvMkPMal3FGGUFPHBNMBRQaeZvy88M40ymBEh5059OFrWs1OBj Cancel-Lock: sha1:8H6BwtJdQV/nxrQq/NaI4qeSVgg= sha256:SFEcEtfe4BhP75avlbqE8Ol/jHGRP+wqRVU1RZ3i76g= User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:70796 On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:21:13 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > c186282 wrote: >> The many little BookWorm problems were very REAL. >> IMHO it was released at least six months before it should have been. >> Also stuck with BullsEye for as long as practical. > > Where are your bugreports? Did we fix them? > >> Prob - the PI-5s were all tuned for BookWorm. Had to set them aside >> for nearly a YEAR because of that. > > Hm. Are you talking about Raspberry Pi OS or about Debian? > > "We" up there means Debian. In my case I did not upgrade my production x64 Linux box from Bullseye. I did put Raspberry Pi OS on a Pi 5 and it identifies as Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) in neofetch.