Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: printer purchases
Date: 4 Aug 2025 19:04:24 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <mfcehoF87m2U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <106n49s$5c$1@reader1.panix.com> <106pgsv$207l1$1@dont-email.me> <106pq8l$2202p$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net GQCTBqK5Z3rKm1i5yNqZJAl6ufRXbu3sAtFhjLGuspXNRcb2yH
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/2SYiNQA1D69EvPQtlER5YI2mkQ= sha256:0s35QCGqoDo5snhMUrlvJ/4PUinQWwN2IhQXMDPBV94=
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:70339

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 09:16:21 +0100, Nuno Silva wrote:

> Actually, no, inkjet is only efficient if you print a lot. The less you
> print, the more you should prefer something that's not inkjet.

I don't print much. With inkjets every infrequent attempt to print 
resulted in a session with ammonia and a toothbrush to try to resurrect 
clogged cartridges.