Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::5!not-for-mail From: Rich Alderson Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: evolution of bytes, The joy of FORTRAN Date: 28 Feb 2025 21:39:46 -0500 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 13 Sender: alderson+news@panix5.panix.com Message-ID: References: <1976765442.762208809.808387.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <20250225130315.00004e34@gmail.com> <1924764604.762215659.468999.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <175819294.762482901.217276.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::5"; logging-data="11408"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 22.3 Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:230223 comp.os.linux.misc:65893 Peter Flass writes: > A lot of older machines were character-addressable. The term "byte" hadn't > been invented yet. The 1401 (etc), 1620, and many 70xx machines. Point of order: Yes, it had. It simply was a term of art in signal processing, not in computer engineering. -- Rich Alderson news@alderson.users.panix.com Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur, omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus. --Galen