Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Anybody Using IPv6?
Date: 21 May 2025 12:45:29 GMT
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <m96079Fn22sU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <m8smu5F4395U5@mid.individual.net> <w6GdneCj_9dqyrT1nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <100c46e$3c1el$1@news1.tnib.de> <m91evtFfleU3@mid.individual.net> <100hcra$3nsq7$1@news1.tnib.de> <100hijb$25ta5$5@dont-email.me> <100hl34$3of0i$1@news1.tnib.de> <m935taF8pgbU4@mid.individual.net> <100i89e$19k3$1@news1.tnib.de> <100i92h$2a8rb$3@dont-email.me> <m93p9bF8pgcU12@mid.individual.net> <100ieve$1o3d$1@news1.tnib.de> <m93tqqF8pgcU15@mid.individual.net> <m94ut4FctjhU2@mid.individual.net> <100jqi7$4o27$1@news1.tnib.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net asdhDL3nYP7m/dfZuIGY/Q2uc/Agf6EMjTK57XzRgAuN4nyGAQ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mHhDxtWJAKRsi7PosX+0Ck8TgSg= sha256:qgJ5NUKA3FaGDXWmJwBEq45qVRRzNtyvRNjwCRNv0PY=
X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP`
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Hmm4; 7b109588; Linux-6.14.7)
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:67630

On Wed, 21 May 2025 08:07:02 +0200, Marc Haber
<mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> wrote in <100jqi7$4o27$1@news1.tnib.de>:

> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>If you don't have global IPv6 reachability, why have a global
>>address (bogus or otherwise)?
> 
> So that you do not need to renumber when you eventually get connected.
> There are more than enough IPv6 addresses to do it this way, this is
> one of IPv6's major advantages.
> 
> Greetings
> Marc

A pox on you for aggressive snipping! ;P

His address is:

] inet6 fc00::16  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x0<global>

Um...

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.14.7 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "I would jog, but the ice would fall out of my glass."