Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Anybody Using IPv6? Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:42:21 +0200 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <100c46e$3c1el$1@news1.tnib.de> <100hcra$3nsq7$1@news1.tnib.de> <100hijb$25ta5$5@dont-email.me> <100hl34$3of0i$1@news1.tnib.de> <100i89e$19k3$1@news1.tnib.de> <100i92h$2a8rb$3@dont-email.me> <100ieve$1o3d$1@news1.tnib.de> <100irbu$2j9c$1@news1.tnib.de> <100jqfp$4o04$1@news1.tnib.de> <100k1v0$2o6n2$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net yh6TADgkNQ0Hr3ILtRysLQOEei2LnNkCA9w6Sf9Rx0Ts3Obr8s Cancel-Lock: sha1:ih25tR9KA7Fial0QplGUr5zWhDM= sha256:vyMlbfOucLkMeIJ5pxYqGDP+kPrRfu8B6xDBLOuIonk= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-CA, es-ANY In-Reply-To: <100k1v0$2o6n2$1@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:67625 On 2025-05-21 10:13, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2025-05-21, Marc Haber wrote: > >> "Carlos E. R." wrote: >>> On 2025-05-20 23:14, Marc Haber wrote: >>>> "Carlos E. R." wrote: >>>>> On 2025-05-20 19:43, Marc Haber wrote: >>>>>> What does the IPv6 routing table of the system in question say? >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a problem with the laptop currently. The problem was some >>>>> years ago, on several computers. >>>>> >>>>> cer@Isengard:~> ip route >>>>> default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 >>>>> 192.168.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.16 >>>>> cer@Isengard:~> >>>> >>>> That is not the IPv6 routing table. >>> >>> That is all there is. >> >> The correct command is ip -6 route. >> >> You don't have the most basic knowledge and still you feel yourself >> qualified to judge about the protocol. That's Dunning-Kruger at work. > > Yet you keep doing the same about judging people. That's hypocrisy at > work. > ... > I was planning not to mention this, given I don't have much to recall, > but if you're going to insist on that aggressive approach, judging > people, taking a chance at bullying if someone dares to use ifconfig, > and at the same time asserting the problem doesn't exist, I don't think > I can afford not to comment. Thanks. I could of course have very easily searched for the modern ipv6 routing command and not ran afoul of his taunts. I just don't remember commands that I do not use. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R.