Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: 26 Mar 2025 16:56:30 GMT Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <20250227080310.0000604d@gmail.com> <13f2ujh7om0c39n6cd1e3n9j4hn18akkdc@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net RNWcqaOfXbprZJz0aTXzKA14UEz+sc/Rj5P8GZP0fAfO9yr/Qj Cancel-Lock: sha1:MUfun0lKeMc+roI9l87V5nKVcCE= sha256:Pwov9NJVtSS5P/RFBNOrWVNYxwwv74RAa5A2Jd6UOKs= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:230628 comp.os.linux.misc:66639 On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 23:58:16 -0400, c186282 wrote: > On 3/25/25 9:52 PM, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:54:49 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Good stuff ... but it is, what would you call it ... 'active', >>> 'class-a', fluidic logic. Seems to require a constant flow thru >>> the specially-designed chamber. For a full CPU we'd be talking a >>> huge amount of water flow. >> >> Not all fluids are water. > > Of COURSE they are ... HYDraulics !!! :-) Obviously you need to sign up for Fluid Dynamics 201. > Some kind of light oil may have been the better choice ... but not > TOO thick. You must have skipped the article. When you're talking about a system where 1 is represented by a vacuum and 0 as atmospheric pressure, you're not talking about light oil.