Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tahitian pearl Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Another new PC for me! Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:25:55 -0600 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <9fusrj5r2ns0g1j5n54bsnaoqqk1pv9iv5@4ax.com> <9kednQ4oHKEAvCL6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 8ddb6ynFDdrOXBf56LAZvgoHgrl4Ox78R3kKCAEbnJs+skBUwd Cancel-Lock: sha1:jJgDcrdRNnPLwdamkdU4g+crmHs= sha256:M2y23zWsRCPd5FFdoNerTkXpS4evJlXWfNNfvvju5R4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:686700 alt.checkmate:658647 talk.politics.guns:1709982 comp.os.linux.misc:65732 Farley Flud wrote: > On 26 Feb 2025 14:20:25 GMT, vallor wrote: > >> >> That being said, it's nice to read about the system specs of a system >> that has actually been built, rather than Feeb's 4-month trickle >> of "it's almost done! Just another two months, and it will be ready!" >> > > Attention bozo. > > The hardware part is easy and quick. It is the software tuning > that requires some extra effort. > > This i5 machine is destined to be underutilized due to the installation > of generic distro software. > > I just did a scimark4 benchmark on my Xeon W-1270P machine. The composite > score was 37219 (and that's only using a single thread). > > I recall Melzzz a few years back extolling his Apphole M1 machine > with a score of 3500 (I don't recall the exact figure) -- and this > Xeon hardware was released in 2019! I get my mozzarella sticks from Arby's as well. The jalapeño poppers remind of this frog I used to date, but they don't taste like chicken. -- No heebies, creepies or hallucinogenics It's the height of paranoia Male, white, mid-to-late thirties