Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Date: 11 Feb 2025 01:59:40 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <8b262a1f-507f-ef10-e4d3-a981dca5b7d1@example.net> <655acbf6-05e5-69ff-8a44-9f7075aafa2e@example.net> <9RycneStTKjZETf6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net m7mSIDundQpTDoZyYDN/QQyOVenlq0YNj9ui80F5hSx2UYQdJ8 Cancel-Lock: sha1:S7WeUMIgH5gW1qsCYg6Xrc8q8Ig= sha256:LcT9a5B7I7MykE1goaU+MpraKKDEp+h/xiMJ8z0U+DI= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:65384 comp.os.linux.advocacy:685627 On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:31:13 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > TK is also pretty well documented since it's been around for awhile. > Actually none of the graphics toolkits are particularly 'elegant' or > great joys to use so go with what seems easiest for the job. That's got to be the understatement of the week. > Mostly if I need something with a quickie GUI then I use Lazarus/FPC > when possible. The WYSIWYG form builder with a zillion possible > options is WAY nicer than the line-at-a-time TK approach plus Pascal > looks much nicer than Python or 'C'. https://realpython.com/qt-designer-python/ That talks about PyQt but I use PySide6. I'll skip the rant about Riverside Computing, TrollTech, and my thoughts on Pascal.